Author: Abdirashid D

Abdirashid is the founder of Voices of Somalia, and dedicated cybersecurity specialist. His passion for service and community empowerment led him to establish this platform. Driven by a genuine concern for the well-being and advancement of those he serves. Abdirashid resides in Northern Virginia with his family, where he continues to blend his professional skills with his dedication to fostering positive change in his community.

The Hypocrisy of Somali Politics & Balkanization?

by

The level of hypocrisy in Somali politics has reached new heights. It seems like the political elite can’t wait for a moment before diving straight into the next round of contradictions and power plays. Honestly, the hypocrisy of our people and our politicians never ceases to surprise me. Munafiq (hypocrisy) runs deep in this country, and it’s painfully obvious.

Take a look at the situation with Ahmed Islam. Just a few years ago, the individuals who were fiercely opposed to his leadership in Jubaland are now his strongest supporters. On the flip side, those who backed him in his last election are now questioning his legitimacy, including, President Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud himself. It’s a complete reversal—and it says everything about the opportunistic nature of our political landscape.

Hassan Sheikh, for all his talk of uniting the country, seems intent on eroding Ahmed Islam’s control over Jubaland. The aftermath of the failed 1p1v (One Person, One Vote) negotiations at the National Consultative Council (NCC) has been messy, and now we’re seeing the government move to arrest Ahmed Islam for defying orders not to hold his recent elections. They say it’s all about enforcing the new 1p1v system passed by Parliament. But let’s be real: this is about control, and Hassan Sheikh’s desire to consolidate power.

But this goes beyond just Jubaland. Other regional governments, whose terms have been extended under the current administration, are also watching closely. The message sent to Jubaland seems to be aimed at all of them—don’t get too comfortable, or you might find yourself on the receiving end of the same treatment.

So how did we end up here? Not long ago, leaders from Puntland and Jubaland were fiercely opposing Farmajo, accusing him of dictatorial tendencies. Now, those same leaders are accusing Hassan Sheikh of doing exactly the same thing. And guess what? The international community, which once supported the calls for regime change, now seems to be backing Hassan Sheikh’s government. Were they right back then, or are they right now? Maybe It’s for you to decide, but the contradictions are glaring.

And what about the current administration? From day one, we’ve seen a pattern of consolidating power, spreading nepotism, and turning the supposed “parliament” into a rubber stamp for whatever they want to do. The current government has bought off its supporters in the legislature—but the real question is: will it all pay off in the end?

Puntland and Jubaland have both distanced themselves from the federal government, and it’s no surprise. Wasn’t it Ahmed Islam who supported the government when the constitution was amended earlier this year? Where did things go wrong? Didn’t Ahmed amend the Jubaland Constitution to allow himself to run for another term after his mandate expired? What right did he have to make such an amendment? Why didn’t the federal government raise these issues during the last NCC meetings? Were they so sure Ahmed would just fall in line with the extension granted to regional governments? And what is the legal basis for those extensions in the first place?

And let’s talk about the arrest warrant issued for Ahmed Islam by a court in Mogadishu. Does the federal government even have the jurisdiction to enforce it? Why didn’t they act when Musa Bihi signed the MOU with Ethiopia without consulting the federal government? Or when Bihi’s forces were committing atrocities in Lasacanood? Is it because they consider Somaliland somehow separate from Somalia? These inconsistencies raise more questions than answers.

It’s impossible not to notice the glaring contradictions and questionable actions of this administration. And while I’m just asking questions, I think there’s a bigger picture here that we need to confront. I believe, what we’re seeing is a deliberate plan to balkanize Somalia. I’ve been saying for years that there were forces at work to divide the country, but the right person to execute that plan wasn’t in power until now. Given the way Hassan Sheikh is maneuvering, it’s hard not to see a wider strategy unfolding—one where the fragmentation of Somalia becomes inevitable.

If Somalis were ever asked directly whether they wanted to divide the country, the answer would almost certainly be no. But instead, a plan seems to be in motion to create the very conditions that would make division seem like the only way forward. I don’t know where this will lead us, but it feels like we’re being pushed toward an outcome that will fracture the country even further.

The writing has been on the wall for a long time, and now with the growing threat from the Houthis to certain key international shipping routes, coupled with the shifting geopolitics and the intensifying rivalry between the West and the East, these forces are beginning to converge. God knows where this will all lead. I can only hope for the best for our people and our nation, but the outlook is grim if we don’t come together and agree on a shared path forward.

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Can Somalia Safeguard Its Returning Citizens?

by

The President of the Federal Government of Somalia is demonstrating a shortsighted approach when compared to his peers, such as President William Ruto of Kenya. Earlier this year, President Ruto signed a forward-thinking migration deal with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, securing pathways to job creation for Kenyan youth. Meanwhile, Somalia’s president appears more focused on policies that may jeopardize the already vulnerable Somali population forced to flee due to dire conditions he helped create. Just days ago, we saw the demolition of homes without plans to relocate those displaced to safe, livable conditions. Can we truly trust this administration to safely bring back its citizens when it can’t even provide stable living conditions for those within its borders?

If the government cannot create opportunities for its people, the least it can do is refrain from endangering those seeking better lives abroad. It’s evident that Germany, facing internal population declines, strategically shapes migration policies to fill its needs while filtering out those deemed undesirable. This is illustrated by Germany’s recent steps, such as the migration commissioner’s proposal to deport migrants arriving illegally via Belarus to Rwanda.

There is nothing inherently wrong with repatriating Somali citizens, but the question remains: does this government have the capacity or willingness to improve conditions? Europe is not the refuge it once was, and if life were truly better in Somalia, its citizens would willingly return. However, the harsh reality is that the current administration struggles to manage internal affairs, let alone facilitate a dignified return for its people.

Moreover, this entire situation ultimately revolves around the financial incentives Germany offers to manage its unwanted migrant population, predominantly from Muslim-majority countries. Ironically, it is the same Western policies that have contributed to conflicts and unlivable conditions that force people to flee their homes. Instead of engaging in appeasement for short-term gains, Somalia’s administration should leverage negotiations for investment in its natural resources, particularly oil.

Since the onset of the Ukraine war and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, Germany has been purchasing oil at premium prices from other countries. It is in desperate need of energy. The Somali government should capitalize on this need, promoting investment in the country’s oil sector rather than behaving with an NGO mindset. Just recently, Volkswagen announced plans to close at least three factories in Germany and lay off tens of thousands of workers due to soaring energy costs.

Furthermore, the German government seems to be on the brink of collapse, with expectations for snap elections to be called. This instability should be a wake-up call for Somalia to act strategically and focus on long-term national interests.

The seriousness of such migration agreements cannot be understated. They hold the potential to set a precedent that other European countries might follow, tightening their policies and expanding deportation efforts. Once again, the question stands: Is Somalia ready to accept its citizens?

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Somali Federal Government and the South West Region

by

The political landscape in Somalia is constantly evolving with regional interests, and external influences. Among the most contentious areas is the South West region, where the presence of Ethiopian forces and the rising frustrations of regional president Abdiaziz Laftagareen with deep-rooted issues that the federal government in Mogadishu appears reluctant to address.

South West Region: A Historical and Strategic Misstep

The South West region, rich in resources such as fertile land, minerals, and potential oil reserves, has long been a battleground for both local and international interests. Ethiopian forces, operating under the guise of stabilizing the region, have maintained a heavy presence, which no Somali could be happy with. Abdiaziz Laftagareen, the regional president, has voiced his frustrations over what he perceives as an occupation that undermines his authority and the autonomy of the South West state. His frustrations are not only about the external military presence but also about the broader implications for regional autonomy and development. The alleged planned deployment of Egyptian forces in South West and the federal government’s political maneuvers could only further complicate the situation.

Historically, the deployment of Ethiopian forces in the region was made without proper consultation with local stakeholders, exacerbating tensions and resentment among the population. The lack of local consultation and the imposition of external forces contributed to the rise of Al-Shabaab in the region, as grievances over foreign intervention fueled support for extremist groups.

Furthermore, the South West region, has faced chronic underfunding and inadequate resources to build and equip its own forces. This lack of support from the central government contrasts sharply with the opposition stance of the current administration, which had previously opposed the deployment of Somali National Army (SNA) forces in the region by the previous administration. This historical opposition highlights a shift in policy once they came into power, reflecting a broader pattern of inconsistent and politically motivated decisions. The federal government, which has been accused of politicizing the region against Abdiaziz Laftagareen is perceived to be undermining Laftagareen’s authority and destabilizing the region for political gains.

Egypt’s Rhetoric in the Shadow of Conflict

Egypt has been increasingly vocal against Ethiopia, particularly in relation to the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Nile River. Egyptian rhetoric often hints at the possibility of war, rightfully so framing Ethiopia as a regional aggressor. However, this narrative overlooks the complex realities on the ground in the South West region of Somalia, where local populations are already vulnerable to terrorism and political instability.

Adding fuel to the fire, pro-Egyptian Twitter accounts and other pro-government accounts have been actively pushing propaganda that encourages conflict. One Egyptian account in particular, Khaled Mahmoued, is promoting a narrative that glorifies war while downplaying the severe impact such a conflict could have on the Somali nation. By stoking fears and inflaming hostilities, these voices are not only jeopardizing regional stability but also infringing on the sovereignty and well-being of the Somali people, who are caught in the crossfire of this broader geopolitical struggle.

Federal Government’s Silence: A Strategic Misstep?

One of the most puzzling aspects of the current situation is the Somali federal government’s apparent indifference to the concerns raised by the South West region. Despite the clear frustrations expressed by President Laftagareen, regional MP’s, Mogadishu has remained largely silent, failing to address the issues that are driving a wedge between the central government and one of its key regional states.

This silence could be due to several factors. The federal government may be trying to avoid a direct confrontation with Ethiopia, who are currently part of the peacekeeping forces. Alternatively, it could be a strategic decision to focus on other regions perceived as more critical to national stability. However, this approach risks alienating the South West region and exacerbating the very tensions that could lead to further instability.

Samira Gaid, a security expert in the Horn of Africa, emphasizes the importance of the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) collaborating with Federal Member States (FMS) and other stakeholders to ensure security after the Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF) exit. She advocates for unity and collective action in addressing these critical issues.

There are concerns among certain segments of the Somali population regarding the deployment of alleged Egyptian troops. Specifically, many are questioning why these troops have not been assigned to the Somaliland region, where the controversial Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Ethiopia was signed and where Ethiopia plans to establish a military base. This discrepancy has led to suspicions and speculation about the true intentions behind the presence of these forces in Somalia. The lack of clarity surrounding their deployment raises questions about the consistency and fairness of the peacekeeping arrangements and whether they are genuinely aimed at addressing regional stability or serving other agendas.

By failing to engage in meaningful dialogue and collaboration with regional leaders, the federal government risks further isolating the South West region, potentially igniting conflicts that could spread to other parts of the country. This inaction also raises the possibility that the South West region could take a similar path to Puntland by exiting the federal union of Somalia, further destabilizing the unity of an already fragile state. A unified approach is essential to creating a stable environment where both the central government and regional states can address their shared challenges together.

Rising Tensions: Calls for Harsh Repercussions Against South West MPs

The political climate in Somalia has become so charged that certain groups are now calling for the harsh action against Members of SW MP’s who dare to raise valid concerns about the federal government’s handling of the South West crisis. This alarming development highlights the dangerous polarization within Somali politics, where dissent is increasingly met with threats rather than dialogue.

Such a response only serves to deepen divisions and undermine the very foundations of the federal system. This situation could also validate the concerns of some in the Somali public who fear that the presence of Egyptian forces in the region may be an attempt to silence opposition rather than provide constructive support. Instead of fostering unity and dialogue, these actions could further destabilize the country, making it more vulnerable to both internal strife and external exploitation.

The Way Forward

As Somalia navigates these complex challenges, it is crucial for the federal government to take a more proactive approach in addressing the concerns of the South West region. This includes engaging in meaningful dialogue with regional leaders like Abdiaziz Laftagareen, Saeed Abdullahi Deni, reassessing the role of Ethiopian and Egyptian forces, and ensuring that any international agreements involving the region prioritize the well-being of the local population.

The Somali people stand firmly behind their government, but it is equally crucial for the government to listen to its people and act in the interest of unity, national integrity, and the stability of the Horn of Africa. It is important to understand that calling for peace is not a sign of weakness but a demonstration of strength and leadership. Peaceful resolution and dialogue are the cornerstones of sustainable governance and stability. However, if peace efforts do not yield the desired results, the Somali people, with the grace of God, are prepared to defend their sovereignty and address threats with the resolve and resilience that has characterized their history.

Moreover, the government must take a firm stand against those who seek to silence dissent through violence or intimidation. Protecting the rights of MPs and other political actors to speak out is essential to maintaining a healthy democracy and finding a peaceful resolution to the crisis.

In conclusion, the situation in the South West region is a microcosm of the broader challenges facing Somalia. It is a region rich in potential but also rife with tensions that could easily spiral out of control if not carefully managed. The federal government must recognize that the stakes are high—not just for the South West, but for the future of Somalia as a whole.

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Letter to Mr. President

Dear Mr. President,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address several pressing concerns that have been raised by various segments of our society and to offer constructive feedback on your administration’s recent actions and policies.

  1. Unity and National Cohesion: Our nation is facing numerous challenges, and fostering unity is more important than ever. I urge you to prioritize efforts to bring together all communities and strengthen national cohesion to ensure we face these challenges as a united front.
  1. Transparency and Addressing Corruption Allegations: It is crucial to address the allegations of corruption transparently, particularly those involving your family. The public has voiced serious concerns about the integrity of your administration and its dealings. To restore confidence, I urge you to take a strong stand against corruption by:
    • Addressing any allegations involving your family openly to ensure transparency and accountability.
    • Implementing robust anti-corruption measures to prevent future issues and reassure the public of your commitment to integrity.
  1. EAC Membership and Economic Concerns: Your decision to join the East African Community (EAC) is commendable for fostering regional integration, but there are concerns about Somalia’s readiness to compete with larger companies backed by EAC governments. It is important to ensure that our entry into the EAC does not disproportionately disadvantage local businesses and that adequate measures are in place to support them.
  1. Regional Security and Diplomatic Actions: The recent actions concerning Ethiopia and the perceived political nature of these responses need to be addressed transparently. Additionally, the ongoing presence of Ethiopian agents and the trade of khat, along with allegations of your family’s involvement, have created confusion and mistrust. Addressing these issues openly will help in clarifying the situation and rebuilding public confidence.
  1. Political and Regional Dynamics: The recent interactions with Muse Bihi earlier this year in Djibouti, despite his defeat by SSC, have raised questions about your administration’s approach to national unity. Clear and consistent communication about your administration’s stance and actions in this regard would be beneficial. Furthermore, your administration must take tangible actions towards the Awdal State to address longstanding issues and concerns.
  1. Constitutional Reforms and Political Integrity: The introduction of Egypt under President Sisi and your administration’s approach to the 1m1Vote initiative have raised concerns about potential moves towards authoritarianism. Ensuring that the constitutional process is completed with transparency and adherence to democratic principles will be crucial in maintaining public trust.
  1. National Stability and Security: Alarming reports have surfaced about potential alliances between the Houthis and Al-Shabab by certain groups. These groups appear to be exploiting the ‘war on terror’ to serve their own agendas, further destabilizing the region and Somalia. It is important to address these threats proactively to maintain national stability.
  1. Social Media and Advisory Council: I encourage you to manage social media discourse carefully and consider broadening your advisory council to include diverse perspectives. This will help in making informed decisions and addressing the various concerns of the Somali public effectively.

Thank you for your attention to these matters. I hope that you will take these suggestions into consideration to foster a more transparent, unified, and prosperous Somalia.

Sincerely,

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Washington Somali Stars Tournament

Celebrating Legacy and Talent

Date

August 30

Location

Drapper Drive Park
9797 Beech Dr
Fairfax, VA 22031

Teams

Washington, DC
Atlanta
Ohio
Maine
Boston
Toronto

Final Game (Sept 1)

Oakton High School
2900 Sutton Rd
Vienna, VA 22181

History

The Washington Somali Stars have long been a beacon of pride and excellence within the Somali community, tracing their origins back to a time when soccer was more than just a sport—it was a unifying force. Established over four decades ago, the Washington Somali Stars quickly ascended to prominence, becoming a formidable presence in the Washington soccer scene. Their rivalry with the Somali community in Boston, which began in 1985, set the stage for what would become the first Somali Soccer Tournament in North America. This rivalry, marked by intense competition and mutual respect, laid the foundation for a tradition that continues to thrive today.

The Stars’ crowning achievements in the late 1980s, particularly their victories in the 1987 and 1988 Washington Metro International Tournament finals, solidified their place in the upper echelons of the soccer community. These triumphs rallied a dedicated fan base that extended far beyond Washington, drawing support from Somali communities across North America.

As the Stars prepare to host the upcoming tournament, they do so with a legacy of excellence and a commitment to fostering both new and seasoned talent. This year’s event will feature two distinct competitions: a 7v7 tournament for players over 35, emphasizing sportsmanship and camaraderie, and an 11v11 tournament for youth players, where scouts will be on the lookout for the next generation of soccer talent.

The Washington Somali Stars have always been more than just a soccer team—they are a symbol of unity, discipline, and community spirit. The club’s leadership has been steadfast in maintaining the team’s mission and goals, underscored by the establishment of Club Bylaws that govern its operations. As they continue to refine their structure and tactics, the Washington Somali Stars remain a pillar of the Somali community, inspiring passion and pride in soccer fans across the continent.

As teams from across the region converge for this highly anticipated tournament, the Washington Somali Stars invite all to witness the blend of tradition and talent that has defined their storied history. Whether you’re cheering for the seasoned veterans or the rising stars, this tournament promises to be a celebration of soccer, community, and the enduring spirit of the game.

Connect with the team

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Impact of Somalia’s 5% Digital Transaction Tax

by

The recent introduction of a 5% tax on all digital transactions by the Somali government has ignited debate about its effects on small businesses and the overall economy. While the tax aims to increase government revenue, it also highlights serious deficiencies in the government’s service provision, transparency, and oversight. Additionally, the tax may open doors for companies from the East African Community (EAC) to capture market share from struggling Somali businesses. Here’s an in-depth look at the implications of this tax and the potential threat from EAC competitors.

Challenges for Small Businesses

The new 5% tax places a heavy burden on small businesses, which are already struggling with tight profit margins and limited resources. Unlike large corporations, small businesses cannot easily absorb or pass on additional costs to their customers without risking their survival.

With the tax increasing operational costs, small business owners may be forced to raise prices, leading to decreased consumer spending. This could result in lower revenues and even business closures, exacerbating economic instability and job losses. The government’s failure to provide adequate support and advisory services for these businesses compounds their struggles, leaving them more vulnerable to economic pressures.

Economic Ripple Effects

Without adequate support services, small businesses are likely to face severe financial pressure. The tax increase might lead them to raise prices, which can reduce consumer spending. As people spend less, businesses may see decreased revenues and even face closure. This could result in job losses and further economic instability, making the tax policy’s impact even more pronounced.

Shortcomings in Transparency and Accountability

The government’s handling of this tax has also exposed gaps in transparency and accountability. There is little information about how the tax revenue will be used or whether it will benefit the economy and small businesses. Without clear reporting and auditing, it’s hard to see whether the funds will be spent wisely or if they’ll address the challenges faced by businesses and the public.

Backend System Security Risks

Digital transaction systems, managed by telecoms and fintech companies, are crucial for the economy but can be vulnerable to security issues. Inadequate oversight and protection of these systems increase the risk of tampering or misuse, which can unfairly impact businesses and consumers. For example, tampering with transaction data could unfairly influence competition or distort market competition.

Protecting Sensitive Information

Protecting transaction data is vital for maintaining fair competition and business integrity. Cases where companies misuse data to gain an unfair advantage highlight the need for strong data protection. Instances where companies have misused seller information to undermine competitors—such as Amazon allegedly using data from its marketplace to launch competing products—illustrate the dangers of inadequate data protection. In Somalia, the lack of clear regulations and oversight around digital transactions puts businesses at risk of such abuses, potentially undermining the digital economy’s growth.

Opportunity for EAC Companies

The 5% tax on digital transactions could inadvertently create opportunities for companies from the East African Community (EAC) to gain market share in Somalia. EAC companies, with their larger financial resources and established market presence, might be better equipped to handle the tax burden. These companies can potentially offer lower prices or more competitive services, attracting Somali customers who are priced out of the local market.

For example, if Somali small businesses struggle to compete with the reduced prices offered by EAC companies, they might lose customers to these external competitors. This shift could result in EAC companies capturing a significant portion of the Somali market, further weakening the local business sector and reducing economic self-reliance.

Moving Forward

To address these issues, the Somali government needs to improve its service delivery and oversight mechanisms. Key steps include:

  1. Supporting Small Businesses: Implement programs to assist small businesses in managing the tax burden and other financial challenges.
  2. Enhancing Transparency: Implementing clear reporting and auditing processes to ensure tax revenues are used effectively.
  3. Securing Digital Systems: Strengthening security measures to protect backend systems from tampering and misuse.
  4. Protecting Data Integrity: Develop regulations to ensure fair competition and safeguard sensitive information against exploitation.

By focusing on these areas, the government can help small businesses navigate the challenges posed by the new tax and reduce the risk of losing market share to EAC competitors. Ensuring a supportive and transparent environment will be crucial in maintaining a resilient and competitive Somali economy.

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dangers Facing Somalia:

by

As Somalia navigates a complex and challenging geopolitical landscape, it faces an array of dangers that threaten its sovereignty, unity, and future. The lack of national mobilization and the increasing dependency on foreign nations have left Somalia vulnerable to external manipulation and internal decay. Without immediate action, the country risks fragmentation or becoming a mere shadow of its former self, consumed by neighboring adversaries.

The Peril of Khat: A Weapon Against Somalia’s Future

One of the most insidious dangers comes from khat, a stimulant drug primarily imported from Ethiopia and Kenya—Somalia’s historical adversaries. The widespread consumption of khat among the Somali population, including the armed forces, poses a significant threat. In the event of conflict, the dependence on this drug could be exploited by Ethiopia and Kenya to weaken and poison the very people who are supposed to defend Somalia. Khat’s destructive impact extends beyond individual health; it undermines the collective strength and readiness of Somalia’s armed forces, leaving the nation exposed and defenseless in the face of aggression.

The Silent Threat of Unaccounted Ethnic Ethiopians

Another growing concern is the presence of unaccounted ethnic Ethiopians across Somalia, embedded within security forces, intelligence, civilian sectors, and the labor workforce. This hidden danger could be mobilized by Ethiopia at a moment’s notice, compromising Somalia’s internal security and sovereignty. The potential for these individuals to act as agents of Ethiopia, whether in times of peace or conflict, is a strategic risk that cannot be ignored. The infiltration of key sectors by foreign nationals further exacerbates Somalia’s vulnerability, creating a ticking time bomb that could be detonated by external powers.

Fragmented Politics: A Nation Divided

Adding to these external threats is the internal division within Somalia itself. The fragmented political landscape, dominated by regional and tribal affiliations, has weakened the nation’s unity and ability to act collectively. These divisions have left Somalia susceptible to manipulation by foreign powers, who exploit the lack of cohesion for their gain. The absence of a unified national vision and purpose has eroded the country’s resilience, making it easy prey for external forces seeking to destabilize and control it.

The Looming Geopolitical Threat: Ethiopia, Kenya, Egypt, and Turkey

As Somalia’s internal divisions persist, a new geopolitical danger looms on the horizon. What if Ethiopia, Kenya, Egypt, and Turkey—four nations with vested interests in the Horn of Africa—negotiate their differences? Such an agreement could come at Somalia’s expense, with these powers carving up influence and territory to serve their strategic objectives. The consequences of such a scenario would be catastrophic, potentially leading to the disintegration of Somalia as a nation-state and the loss of its territorial integrity.

A Call for Immediate Reconciliation and Unity

In light of these mounting dangers, it is imperative that the federal government of Somalia and regional leaders set aside their differences and prioritize the nation’s survival. Good faith reconciliation and concessions are not just desirable; they are necessary to preserve Somalia’s sovereignty and future. Leaders must rise above narrow interests and embrace a shared vision that unites the Somali people against external threats. The time for action is now, before it is too late.

Conclusion: The Future of Somalia Hangs in the Balance

If Somalis do not work out their differences, it is not a matter of if, but when Somalia will break into multiple nations or be consumed by Ethiopia and Kenya. The borders of Somalia could become no more than lines on a map, erased by the ambitions of foreign powers. The Somali nation, rich in history and culture, stands at a crossroads. The path forward requires unity, resilience, and a commitment to the greater good. Without these, Somalia’s future will be written not by its people, but by those who seek to divide and conquer it.

Share this post:

One response to “The Dangers Facing Somalia:”

  1. Habib Avatar
    Habib

    The aesthetic effects of general knowledge, and Somalitology has been dimmed there for almost four decades by human errors, i.e., the civil war (external displacement & internal displacement), famine, mass migration into virtual-reality & creed conflict. Luckily, a few of women and men of young generation, still, have revolted to surrender to this backwardness while the others became victim of crimes against humanity and common sense-phobia.

    Thank you Mr. Abdirashid, for being among those who are willing to shed light on the link between fear and danger.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Somalia and Ethiopia Conflict

by

Turkey’s Balancing Act of Diplomacy and Regional Ambitions

Turkey’s growing influence in the Horn of Africa has positioned it as a key player in the region’s most pressing conflicts, including the complex and historically rooted tensions between Somalia and Ethiopia. As Turkey navigates its relationships with both nations, it faces the challenge of balancing its strategic interests with its role as a mediator in a conflict that touches upon deep-seated issues of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national pride.

Turkey’s Contributions to Somalia: A Decade of Support and Development

Over the past decade, Turkey has established itself as one of Somalia’s most reliable international partners, contributing significantly to the country’s development and stability. Turkey’s involvement in Somalia began in 2011 during the devastating famine, where it provided crucial humanitarian aid, setting the stage for a long-term partnership. Since then, Turkey has invested heavily in Somalia’s infrastructure, education, health, and security sectors.

  • Infrastructure and Economic Development: Turkish companies have played a key role in rebuilding critical infrastructure in Somalia, including the modernization of Mogadishu’s Aden Adde International Airport and the port of Mogadishu. These projects have been vital in restoring Somalia’s connectivity with the world and stimulating economic activity.
  • Education and Health Initiatives: Turkey has also focused on enhancing Somalia’s education and health sectors. The establishment of Turkish-funded schools and scholarships has provided Somali youth with opportunities for higher education, while the construction of the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Hospital in Mogadishu has vastly improved healthcare services in the capital.
  • Security and Military Assistance: Recognizing the importance of security for Somalia’s stability, Turkey has provided military training and support to the Somali National Army (SNA). The Turkish military base in Mogadishu is a testament to Turkey’s commitment to helping Somalia build a capable and professional security force.

Turkey’s Waning Refugee Leverage and Challenges with the EU

Turkey’s proactive foreign policy in Somalia and the broader Horn of Africa is also influenced by its shifting relationship with the European Union (EU). For years, Turkey leveraged its role as host to millions of refugees to gain political and economic concessions from the EU. However, this leverage has diminished over time as Europe has sought to manage the refugee crisis independently, leading Turkey to diversify its foreign policy strategies.

With its influence over the EU diminishing and maritime challenges from conflicts in the Middle East, Turkey has shifted its focus to new regions, notably the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea. By enhancing its involvement in Africa, Turkey seeks to increase its influence, unlock economic opportunities, and establish itself as a pivotal player in global trade routes.

Turkey’s Investments in Ethiopia

Ethiopia, has also become a focal point of Turkey’s foreign policy. Turkey’s investments in Ethiopia have grown significantly, with Turkish businesses playing a major role in the construction, manufacturing, and textile sectors. These economic ties have strengthened the relationship between Ankara and Addis Ababa, making Turkey a critical partner in Ethiopia’s development.

The Somalia-Ethiopia Conflict: Historical Tensions

Amidst Turkey’s deepening ties with both Somalia and Ethiopia, the longstanding conflict between these two nations presents a significant challenge. The Somalia-Ethiopia dispute is rooted in historical grievances, particularly over the Ogaden region—a Somali-inhabited area that has been a flashpoint for conflict for decades. Somalis view the Ogaden as part of their historical territory, a sentiment that has fueled ongoing tensions. In recent years, border skirmishes and disputes between Somali and Ethiopian forces have occasionally flared up, raising concerns about Ethiopia’s respect for Somalia’s sovereignty. Ethiopia’s involvement in Somali politics and its influence over regional administrations has also been a source of contention, with accusations that Addis Ababa is undermining Somalia’s territorial integrity.

Turkey’s Mediation Efforts and the Upcoming Talks

As Turkey stepped in as a mediator, leveraging its strong relationships with both nations to facilitate dialogue and conflict resolution. Turkey’s diplomatic efforts have focused on encouraging direct talks between Somali and Ethiopian leaders, aiming to reduce tensions and promote regional stability. By positioning itself as a neutral party, Turkey has helped create an environment where both sides are negotiate with next rounds of talk scheduled this week. Turkey’s mediation strategy also includes promoting broader regional cooperation, encouraging joint infrastructure projects and economic collaboration that can benefit both Somalia and Ethiopia. This approach could address the underlying issues that contribute to the conflict, fostering a sense of shared interest and mutual benefit.

A Cautionary Note: The Importance of Acknowledging Territorial Integrity

As Turkey mediates the Somalia-Ethiopia conflict, it must tread carefully to avoid damaging the goodwill it has built in Somalia. The recent maritime agreement between Turkey and Somalia, which remains largely unknown to the Somali public, could become a point of contention if any deal is perceived as infringing on Somali territorial sovereignty.

  • Potential Risks to Goodwill: The favorable maritime deal with Somalia, coupled with Turkey’s growing involvement in the region, could be at risk if Somalis feel that their sovereignty is being compromised. Any agreement that disregards Somali territorial claims, especially in regions like the Ogaden where lives were lost, could severely damage Turkey’s reputation in Somalia.
  • The Importance of Territorial Integrity: Turkey’s role as a mediator must respect the territorial integrity of Somalia, acknowledging the historical and emotional significance of regions like the Ogaden. Failure to do so could lead to a loss of trust and undermine Turkey’s broader strategic interests in the Horn of Africa.
  • A Wake-Up Call for Somalia: The ongoing disputes and external influences should serve as a wake-up call for Somalis. The lack of national unity, with factions focused on tribal and regional allegiances, has left Somalia vulnerable to external pressures. For Somalia to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity, there must be a concerted effort to foster national unity and prioritize the nation’s interests over tribal divisions.

Conclusion

Turkey’s involvement in the Somalia-Ethiopia conflict reflects its growing influence in the Horn of Africa and its strategic ambitions in the region. While Turkey’s contributions to Somalia and its investments in Ethiopia have brought significant benefits, the delicate balance of interests in the region requires careful diplomacy. As the upcoming talks between Somalia and Ethiopia approach, Turkey must ensure that any agreements respect Somalia’s territorial integrity and acknowledge the deep historical significance of regions like the Ogaden. Moreover, the situation highlights the need for greater unity within Somalia, as the nation’s fragmented state leaves it susceptible to external pressures and compromises on sovereignty. The path forward must prioritize both the preservation of Somali territory and the strengthening of national cohesion.Somalia’s territorial integrity cannot be overstated. The Ogaden region remains a symbol of Somali national pride, and any resolution must take this into account to ensure a just and lasting peace in the region.

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Remittance Dependence in Somalia

by

Introduction Somalia’s economy has long relied on remittances from its diaspora, with these inflows serving as a lifeline for millions of families. However, this dependence may be contributing to economic stagnation rather than fostering sustainable development. As the Somali diaspora continues to send billions of dollars back home —$548.5 (in Millions) Q2 2023 — I believe, there is a growing concern that this financial support is perpetuating a cycle of dependence and preventing the country from harnessing its own resources. According to the Central Bank of Somalia, the total individual remittances between Q2 2022 and Q1 2023 reached $2.156.6 billion, further emphasizing the scale of this dependence.

The Scale of Remittance Inflows 

Between Q1 2021 and Q2 2023, remittances to Somalia have remained consistently high, although individual contributions have slightly decreased, likely influenced by global economic challenges such as inflation. These inflows are nearly equivalent to the funds received through grants and other swift transfers (possibly from the International community). This dependence might be impeding efforts to develop local industries and self-sustaining economic systems, thereby perpetuating a cycle of poverty and stagnation.

The Argument for Reducing Remittance Inflows 

Proposing a reduction in remittances might seem controversial, even destabilizing. However, it is essential to consider the long-term effects of continued reliance on these funds. The current situation enables stagnation, as the inflow of money from abroad reduces the urgency for structural economic reforms and the development of local reliance. Somalia is rich in natural resources—agriculture, fisheries, and energy potential, to name a few. Yet, these sectors remain underdeveloped as the population relies heavily on remittances instead of leveraging the country’s inherent wealth.

The Need for Change 

The Somali diaspora must reconsider its role in the nation’s economic future. While it is understandable that many have increased their remittance contributions due to rising inflation, it is crucial to recognize that this well-intentioned support could be doing more harm than good in the long run. Reducing remittances might force the Somali government and its people to address underlying economic issues, push for better governance, and invest in local industries. This shift could ultimately lead to a more resilient economy, capable of standing on its own.

Potential Backlash and the Path Forward 

Such a proposal is likely to be met with resistance, as many view remittances as a vital source of support for vulnerable families. However, the long-term benefits of reducing dependence on remittances could outweigh the immediate challenges. To mitigate the potential negative impacts, this approach should be gradual and accompanied by initiatives that empower local communities—through education, skills training, and investment in local enterprises—to generate income independently.

Conclusion 

In conclusion, Somalia’s reliance on remittances presents a complex challenge: these funds are crucial for survival, yet they may hinder the country’s long-term economic growth. To navigate this paradox, it’s essential to engage in a candid discussion about the future role of remittances and consider a strategic shift toward fostering self-reliance. The Somali diaspora, while continuing to support their loved ones, must also encourage and invest in the country’s long-term development. By teaching their communities to “fish” rather than just providing the “fish,” the diaspora can help Somalia build a more sustainable and prosperous future.

One practical approach is to initiate discussions with your family about investing in local businesses. For example, purchasing and operating businesses such as a Bajaj (three-wheeler vehicle) or a food stall could create jobs and stimulate local economies. Additionally, another promising area for investment is tourism. By developing tourism infrastructure, such as providing guided tours and accommodation, the local communities can attract visitors and generate new revenue streams. This not only creates economic opportunities but also promotes cultural exchange and strengthens community ties (diaspora and local communities).

By focusing on entrepreneurial ventures and fostering tourism, the diaspora and local communities can help Somalia build a more resilient and prosperous future, transforming remittance dependence into a foundation for sustainable growth.

References:

Central Bank of Somalia. (2024). Quarterly Economic Report Q2 2023.

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Spotlight Sample Template

Founder & CEO, SomaliTech

Based in Toronto, Canada

Born in Mogadishu, Somalia

Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

Technology has the power to bridge gaps, connect communities, and drive economic growth. My mission is to harness this power for the benefit of Somalia and its diaspora.

Early Life and Education

Xalimo was born in Mogadishu but her family fled to Canada during the civil war when she was just five years old. Growing up in Toronto, she developed a passion for technology and its potential to connect people across borders.

1990-2008

University and Early Career

Xalimo graduated with a degree in Computer Science from the University of Toronto. She then worked for several tech startups, gaining valuable experience in software development and project management.

2008-2014

Founding SomaliTech

Inspired by the potential of technology to aid development in Somalia, Xalimo founded SomaliTech. The company started as a small consultancy but quickly grew into a full-fledged software development firm.

2015

Expansion and Growth

SomaliTech expanded its operations, opening offices in Nairobi and Mogadishu. The company became known for its innovative solutions in mobile banking, education technology, and agricultural tech.

2016-2020

Recognition and Awards

Xalimo was named one of Forbes’ “30 Under 30” in Technology. SomaliTech received the African Diaspora Awards’ “Tech Company of the Year” recognition.

2021

Current Focus

Today, Xalimo is focused on scaling SomaliTech’s impact, with a particular emphasis on projects that support economic development and education in Somalia. She’s also become a prominent advocate for women in tech.

2022-Present

Impact and Future Plans

Through SomaliTech, Xalimo has created over 200 jobs across North America and East Africa. The company’s mobile banking solution has brought financial services to over 500,000 previously unbanked individuals in Somalia.

Looking ahead, Xalimo plans to launch a tech incubator in Mogadishu to nurture the next generation of Somali tech entrepreneurs. She’s also working on a initiative to bring coding education to rural areas of Somalia through mobile learning platforms.

“My dream is to see Somalia become a hub for technological innovation in East Africa,” says Xalimo. “We have the talent and the drive. With the right support and infrastructure, I believe we can make this a reality.”

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *